2 ms·
yeah people still do it but at least adding the "ultra" indicates is not something a person cooking for their family would be doing to food
by snapcaster 2y ago
yeah people still do it but at least adding the "ultra" indicates is not something a person cooking for their family would be doing to food
- tjpnz 2y agoUntil you add ketchup.
- nightski 2y agoIt's just as dumb though because the act of processing doesn't really mean anything.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 2y agoIf it didn't mean anything then why the findings in the article?
- nightski 2y agoThe findings in the article basically came down to - people eat more calories when it tastes good. Even the article itself admits there are a multitude of other factors that could account for the results other than UPF.
- snapcaster 2y agoIt absolutely does if you're able to take off the pedantry glasses for like 5 seconds. Why are you nitpicking this? is it because you actually think articles like this are about chopping carrots? "if it couldn't be made outside of a factory, don't eat it." from someone else in the comments is pretty clear
- mewpmewp2 2y agoWhy jump from one weird statement to another? Maybe even a worse one?
- cynicalpeace 2y agoHere we go again...
- mewpmewp2 2y agoIt's still a misleading term, so it would be good to talk about what the actual harm is, as to not confuse people. And it does confuse, since I vividly remember as a kid being confused by it, and it's important to have healthy habits from a young age. It always sounded a bit weird that food being "processed" means it's bad, so I didn't understand it really. And if you don't focus on the harm, but use terms like this, it's hard to say what is pseudoscience and what is actual science.