3 ms·
Surely the fact that it's a three ton machine that can accelerate from 0-60 in 3 seconds is relevant too. As far as I'm aware the F150 can't match that.
by Peanuts99 2y ago
Surely the fact that it's a three ton machine that can accelerate from 0-60 in 3 seconds is relevant too. As far as I'm aware the F150 can't match that.
- ryzvonusef 2y ago> Surely the fact that it's a three ton machine that can accelerate from 0-60 in 3 seconds is relevant too. As far as I'm aware the F150 can't match that. The F150 EV has similar weight and speed[1], not sure how it's relevant? In fact it proves the point, no one talks about how the F150 EV or the Silverado EV etc etc having similar characteristic flaws as the cyber truck, because that doesn't generate clicks. If anything should be generating articles, it should be the Hummer EV, that things in absurdly big, heavy and fast, even for american trucks... but that doesn't generate clicks. Cybertruck gets undue attention, mostly negative because clickbait, and we should stop clicking such obvious baits. [1]: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a40120063/2022-ford-f-150-lightning-tested-acceleration/ https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a40120063/2022-ford-f-150-...
- refulgentis 2y agoPeople do, all the time, you just did too. You just linked to an article that did.
- ryzvonusef 2y agoI'm talking about hyperbolic negative coverage, that provide no new information or insight, but bait to attract clicks.