4 ms·
Eh. It was always sort of muddy. We never actually had an implementation of doc2vec as described in the paper.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Eh. It was always sort of muddy. We never actually had an implementation of doc2vec as described in the paper.
- myownpetard 2y agoThat's because attention is all we need.
- griomnib 2y ago…and a green line by the GOOG ticker.
- dekhn 2y agowait. Are you saying you were a paper author who described a method in their paper that wasn't actually implemented? IE, your methods section contained a false description?
- jncfhnb 2y agoNo I’m saying the original doc2vec paper described an approach which the ML community never seemed to actually implement. There were things that were called doc2vec, but they were not what the paper described. Folks mostly seemed to just notice.