> what would it take to disprove it? The actual one with all the dates in it, well, the dates are enough. We are not there. But if you are complaining about t

> what would it take to disprove it? The actual one with all the dates in it, well, the dates are enough. We are not there. But if you are complaining about the general idea that machines will eventually be more capable than humans in every task, and then we can't predict what will happen... If you give up on that "every task"part because it's clearly not necessary, technology has done that a few times already. I don't know how can anybody complain about it except for the reason that it's not an interesting observation.