3 ms·
I am wondering how much cost is needed for serving at such a latency. Of course for customers, static cost depends on the pricing strategy. But still, the cost
by WiSaGaN 2y ago
I am wondering how much cost is needed for serving at such a latency. Of course for customers, static cost depends on the pricing strategy. But still, the cost really determines how widely this can be adopted. Is it only for those business that really need the latency, or this can be generally deployed.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- ilaksh 2y agoMaybe it could become standard for everyone to make giant chips and use SRAM? How many SRAM manufacturers are there? Or does it somehow need to be fully integrated into the chip?
- AlotOfReading 2y agoSRAM is usually produced on the same wafer as the rest of the logic. SRAM on an external chip would lose many of the advantages without being significantly cheaper.
- YetAnotherNick 2y agoYes, the limiting factor for bandwidth is generally the number of pins which are not cheap and you can only have few 1000s in a chip. The absolute state of the art is 36 Gb/s/pin[1], and your $30 RAM could have 6 Gb/s/pin[2]. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDDR7_SDRAM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDDR7_SDRAM [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR5_SDRAM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR5_SDRAM
- why_only_15 2y agothe cost is not the memory technology per se but primarily the wires. SRAM is fast because it's directly inside the chip and so the connections with the logic that does the work is cheap because it's close.