4 ms·
The most crucial decision when joining Mastodon is choosing the most friendly instance. I have a strong interest in interacting with cybersecurity professionals
by ASalazarMX 2y ago
The most crucial decision when joining Mastodon is choosing the most friendly instance. I have a strong interest in interacting with cybersecurity professionals, so infosec.exchange was perfect for me, either browsing subscribed or local posts. Browsing all is something I do only when I'm bored, because many posts are not what I'd like to see. You can always migrate your account if you want.
https://instances.social/ https://instances.social/
That being said, BlueSky is simpler and easier because there's no real federation yet, and even if they have a "Discovery" algorithm, you get many options to control what you want to see. It's feels great, like Twitter before their 2012(ish?) IPO.
- Terr_ 2y ago> The most crucial decision when joining Mastodon is choosing the most friendly instance. I was very disappointed to find out that whatever instance you choose can essentially hold your identity and content hostage. I'd been hoping for something where my identity comes from a private key that I could take elsewhere.
- hugs 2y ago"something where my identity comes from a private key that I could take elsewhere" is a literal technical description of how Nostr works. Relays/servers are basically dumb pipes. You own your data and can repost to different relays (and encouraged to do so.) Problem is if your key is lost or stolen, you're kinda screwed.
- Terr_ 2y agoI looked into running my own instance, but.... It was non-trivial.
- hugs 2y agoYeah, self-hosting the whole stack can be a lot (like Mastodon). I only signed up via the Primal mobile app and left it at that. Private key stays local.
- ASalazarMX 2y agoExcept Nostr is mainly populated by crypto bros, that's not something I'd like to read on a daily basis.
- jghn 2y agoBut not really. I only ever want to see people I follow in my feed. And I can follow people from wherever, not just my instance. So the decision of what instance I chose was inconsequential.
- ASalazarMX 2y agoMastodon allows you move instances with minimal effort. You can redirect your old profile to the new one in another instance, or permanently move it keeping your follows and followers. No one there wants to hold your information hostage, you can always export it, and while it doesn't support importing, you can repost it through their API if you really want to. https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/moving/ https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/moving/
- Terr_ 2y agoI may have been misremembering Lemmy instead. > You can redirect your old profile to the new one Is that true even when the reason for the change is because the instance operator wants to silence you? If you can't put up a metaphorical "Go Here Instead" sign, could they also stop you from "proving" that your new home is legitimate and that you're the same author as before?
- rglullis 2y ago> You can redirect your old profile to the new one in another instance, or permanently move it keeping your follows and followers But you lose all the posts and interactions. Most importantly, you are not keeping your identity, but merely creating a new account with a copy of your follower/following collections. > No one there wants to hold your information hostage, Tell that to a friend of mine who got banned from their instance for committing the crime of being an Ethereum developer. The admin suspended his account and didn't let him go back or initiate the migration process.
- Dylan16807 2y agoA redirect is a pale imitation of a real move.
- chc4 2y agoGood news! You just described how Bluesky works
- lolinder 2y agoExcept for that, as discussed in TFA, Bluesky isn't actually decentralized (yet).
- PaulHoule 2y agoThe rational thing to do for someone who (1) thinks of themselves as a human being first and something else second is to join mastodon.social and (2) cares about visibility (why else are you on social?) is to join the biggest instance you can find. Most notably people can only follow hashtags from accounts that are on their server so if you insist on joining some micro server please save yourself the hassle of putting hashtags on things.
- whatshisface 2y agoI don't think myself as a human being is the right thing to upload to the internet! I'll stay right here thanks. Instead I join specific interest-related communities that offer what I can't find in real life: the one person in the world that's had and overcome the same problem with their table saw.
- danielheath 2y agoI’m on social to interact with folks I know. Visibility to anyone outside that circle is the _last_ thing on my mind.
- Karrot_Kream 2y agoOkay, then don't grandstand and downvote on here and just get on some group chats instead? This is the kind of overemotional comment that degrades social networks anyway.
- ASalazarMX 2y agoEh, there are some aspects of the human condition I'd rather opt out for the time being. Strangely, I find Facebook and WhatsApp more useful to keep in touch with people I care about, and likely won't join the Fediverse any time soon.
- kzrdude 2y agoif you care too much about visibility I think mastodon will be disappointing. They just don't want to be popular, it feels like it's designed to be antipopular.
- JoshTriplett 2y ago> The most crucial decision when joining Mastodon is choosing the most friendly instance. Consider using a self-hosting service, like https://togethr.party/ https://togethr.party/ , to have your own instance on your own domain. Much like email, you should never be beholden to another party for your identity; your hosting service should be an invisible detail that can change without anyone interacting with you needing to notice. I've watched several instances shut down over the years, and have never once regretted the decision to have an instance on my own domain. My social network handle is now the same as my email address, with an extra @ in front.
- danpalmer 2y agoI regretted my decision to self host. It’s expensive (for what it is), there are federation issues with some instances, some admins don’t like smaller unknown instances, it requires a fair bit of active management to keep an instance healthy, and you can’t migrate post history.
- JoshTriplett 2y agoA good self-hosting service should provide full access to extract all your data, such that you can import it into a different service later. I'm paying ~$7/month to own my own fediverse identity, which seems cheap to me. You're right about federation issues, though that's more a limitation of the fediverse protocols and fediverse software that really needs fixing. Fediverse instances don't automatically fetch and show all replies to posts you see, even if it knows they exist, unless your server is already fetching other things from the server hosting those posts. So it's a little harder to see other people's replies, which contributes to the problem of 20 people replying with the same answers because they can't see that other people have already replied. Large instances work around that because everyone's already talking to at least one account on that server. I hope those limitations get fixed someday, but for now they're fundamental to the fediverse.
- vidarh 2y agoYou can extract your data, but you can't import your posts on another Mastodon instance. It's fixable, but thorny. Personally, I think Bluesky is a mix of NIH with a dash of wanting to be a central point of control, that is doomed in the long run - anything that works well for Bluesky can be copied, but the real benefit for the Fediverse in the long run is that Mastodon is just one of many services, or types of services. Every new service gets to hook into an existing network instead of starting from scratch.
- swagv 2y ago[dead]