4 ms·
Which, I would expect, ought to be well known by anyone shopping with lactose issues. It’s like shipping peanut brittle without a label saying that it contains
by alsetmusic 2y ago
Which, I would expect, ought to be well known by anyone shopping with lactose issues. It’s like shipping peanut brittle without a label saying that it contains peanuts. How many people would really be harmed without the recall?
I’m in favor of safety over profit. I’m just bummed at the unnecessary waste.
- bobthepanda 2y agoa lot of the alternative product packaging looks very similar to traditional dairy butter packaging
- assimpleaspossi 2y agoThat sounds like an issue for the alternative people to solve.
- YeBanKo 2y agoIt actually lists milk as an ingredient. So even if you are have doubts if its milkless butter, the ingredient list can clarify it.
- 8note 2y agoIf you see that on a product, you'd expect that the thing was made with milk, but does not contain any as far as you need to worry about allergens, and that it's tested to be safe. It's a valid case in the truth table where somebody with a milk allergy should be safe to eat it
- josephcsible 2y agoDoes any such food product actually exist? Not even just for milk, but for any of the FDA's nine major allergens?
- dialup_sounds 2y agoYou will find that even butter often does not have milk in the ingredients list. E.g. Kerrygold: "pasteurized cream, salt" In this case, the Kirkland's listed "sweet cream" and not milk.