3 ms·
I think it’s simpler than this. Managing people remotely is hard. Most managers still aren’t good at managing remote employees. When managers aren’t managing
by cj 2y ago
I think it’s simpler than this.
Managing people remotely is hard.
Most managers still aren’t good at managing remote employees.
When managers aren’t managing well, “productivity” goes down (however you measure it).
So managers internally advocate for RTO because it’s easier to manage people when they’re in person. (Many people also miss the office, but that group tends to be way less vocal on HN)
And since the company already has the office space, RTO is “free” to do.
And if they’re already looking to cut head count, attrition as a result would be icing on the cake making the decision even more appealing to upper management.
In other words, I think RTO would have still happened 4 years after Covid regardless of whether companies are trying to reduce staff or not. “They’re secretly using RTO to fire us” doesn’t make much sense - companies are very capable of doing layoffs. Hiding or disguising the layoff is more work than just flat out laying people off.
If there’s a leaked memo, I wouldn’t be surprised if
- hackable_sand 2y agoIf you can't manage people remotely then you cannot manage people.
- disgruntledphd2 2y agoYeah but remote management is definitely way harder. That's not to say that management isn't hard anyway, but remote makes it even harder.
- AbstractH24 2y agoGood managers are few and far between so we need to make the best of mediocre ones
- hackable_sand 2y agoFair enough
- HDThoreaun 2y agoA good manager is hard to find
- hackable_sand 2y agoFair enough