3 ms·

> As fans, we implore Crunchyroll to try to acquire an uncut version of the simulcast as we are paying good money each month for the services they provide. See

> As fans, we implore Crunchyroll to try to acquire an uncut version of the simulcast as we are paying good money each month for the services they provide. Seems like they want Crunchyroll to offer it, I wasn't able to spot a mention of taking the safe one down; it's an uncharitable or invalid characterization on the part of the author imo

makeitdouble 2y ago
The whole vibe of the petition was dismissive of the issues and only argued for getting the flashing version, so I understand author's view. E.g. > These things are supposed to help prevent seizures, [...] the ghosting is almost making the visual stimuli worse as people have attested to feeling nauseous and dizzy from the obscene amounts of frame blending. Emphasis mine. I don't know how bad the blurring was in motion, but I read the petitioner's argument as "this version is worse in every way for reasons that are only hypothetical". I really don't see much room for a generous interpretation.
- Aeolun 2y ago
  The generous interpretation that it makes them nauseous instead of giving them an epileptic attack. I’m nearly certain for 90% of people the problem is entirely psychosomatic.
- brailsafe 2y ago
  Seems like the people who signed the petition feel like it's worse for them. Vibes are an interpretation, and I disagree about your interpretation, but you can only quote the words, not the words transposed based on what vibe you get, otherwise you run the risk of prejudice and slander. I read it as "We'd like CR to seek an altered version, because we're not getting what we're laying for". The author said they asked to have the original taken down, followed by calling it ableist. Is the latter really more correct, or is that what's seen through a cynical lens?
  - brailsafe 2y ago
    Unaltered version*

3 ms·

> As fans, we implore Crunchyroll to try to acquire an uncut version of the simulcast as we are paying good money each month for the services they provide. See

by brailsafe 2y ago

makeitdouble 2y ago
The whole vibe of the petition was dismissive of the issues and only argued for getting the flashing version, so I understand author's view. E.g. > These things are supposed to help prevent seizures, [...] the ghosting is almost making the visual stimuli worse as people have attested to feeling nauseous and dizzy from the obscene amounts of frame blending. Emphasis mine. I don't know how bad the blurring was in motion, but I read the petitioner's argument as "this version is worse in every way for reasons that are only hypothetical". I really don't see much room for a generous interpretation.
- Aeolun 2y ago
  The generous interpretation that it makes them nauseous instead of giving them an epileptic attack. I’m nearly certain for 90% of people the problem is entirely psychosomatic.
- brailsafe 2y ago
  Seems like the people who signed the petition feel like it's worse for them. Vibes are an interpretation, and I disagree about your interpretation, but you can only quote the words, not the words transposed based on what vibe you get, otherwise you run the risk of prejudice and slander. I read it as "We'd like CR to seek an altered version, because we're not getting what we're laying for". The author said they asked to have the original taken down, followed by calling it ableist. Is the latter really more correct, or is that what's seen through a cynical lens?
  - brailsafe 2y ago
    Unaltered version*