4 ms·
My assumption is that this will be used to watermark images coming out of cloud-based generative AI.
by mintplant 2y ago
My assumption is that this will be used to watermark images coming out of cloud-based generative AI.
- jsheard 2y agoAnd they'll say it's to combat disinformation, but it'll actually be to help themselves filter AI generated content out of new AI training datasets so their models don't get Habsburg'd.
- muppetman 2y agoI wondered why they'd be doing this NOW and this makes perfect sense!!
- Y_Y 2y ago> their models don't get Habsburg'd. You mean develop a magnificent jawline, or continue to influence Austrian politics?
- selimthegrim 2y agoI was reading an article lately about how a lot of that was really just immensely dumb luck on their inbreeding part - that is, they ended up picking just exactly the worst sort
- glenneroo 2y agoHow do they still influence Austrian politics? Do you have any links or sources? I'm genuinely curious!
- leemailll 2y ago>so their models don't get Habsburg'd. Nice metaphor
- Animats 2y agoWhy? Those are not copyrightable.
- xd1936 2y agoBecause downstream consumers of the media might want to know if an image has been created or manipulated by AI tools.
- Jerrrrrrry 2y agohardware self-evident modules to essentially sign/color all digital files now we need more noise
- poincaredisk 2y agoThis still leaves out non cooperating image generators, and the real bad guys (organised disinformation grups) will use them.
- Moru 2y agoThey would not want to train their next model on the output of the previous one...
- pbhjpbhj 2y agoWho says?