3 ms·
>Monsanto won because they have a superior product, that makes it easier for farmers to grow crops. Cheaper too and leads to better no-till practices. Despite
by Suppafly 2y ago
>Monsanto won because they have a superior product, that makes it easier for farmers to grow crops.
Cheaper too and leads to better no-till practices. Despite all the anti-GMO FUD around it, it's just a superior way to farm by basically any metric you look at.
- marcosdumay 2y ago> by basically any metric you look at No, not by any metric. Area productivity is smaller, the plants take slightly longer growing, it creates dependency on a greed corporation that showed they will trow you under the bus if they wish... But it's cheaper.
- cyberax 2y agoArea productivity _given_ _the_ _same_ _amount_ _of_ _labor_? I don't think so.
- Suppafly 2y ago>No, not by any metric. Area productivity is smaller, the plants take slightly longer growing, it creates dependency on a greed corporation that showed they will trow you under the bus if they wish... Yeah none of that is true. Nice try though.