2 ms·
> That’s what the study concluded, how is it a lie? They use statistics incorrectly. They looked at VAERS that is _literally_ meant for reports of adverse effe
by cyberax 2y ago
> That’s what the study concluded, how is it a lie?
They use statistics incorrectly. They looked at VAERS that is _literally_ meant for reports of adverse effects.
So it's of course correlated with SIDS. The reverse analysis would have proven them wrong.
- willy_k 2y agoI understand that, and I get that this study doesn’t show that 75% of ALL cases are within 7 days of a vaccination. They found that of mortality that occurred within 60 days post-vaccination, 75% happened within 7 days of a vaccination.
- Dylan16807 2y ago> They found that of mortality that occurred within 60 days post-vaccination, Of mortality that occurred within 60 days post-vaccination and was reported to VAERS. I suspect that the vast majority of SIDS deaths that happen a month after vaccination are not in the database. Looking at the reportable events tables for VAERS, some vaccine-specific symptoms have longer reporting periods but generic symptoms like anaphylactic shock only have to be reported for a couple days.