3 ms·
I think people don't realize that it doesn't need to be directly said by a politician to create sentiment. If you look at the online sentiment which greatly af
by Jcampuzano2 2y ago
I think people don't realize that it doesn't need to be directly said by a politician to create sentiment.
If you look at the online sentiment which greatly affects young voters, it is very much anti-men in general. In fact you even have instances of this being seen in popular culture entertainment and slipping into mainstream at times. Especially for CIS white males. And guess which population overwhelmingly both voted for Trump, but also gained voters for the Trump camp? Men.
Anti-male rhetoric is at an all time high, and has given rise to male spaces being dominated by accordingly anti-female rhetoric.
This is in part what the parent comments are mentioning. That many of the most outspoke people for Dems (i.e not necessarily politicians themselves) are women who just entirely dismissed even trying to capture male voters who were on the fence. Yes, I get that it is difficult to resonate with people who vote in favor of taking away womens rights, but the problem is that you just aren't going to win if you don't capture at least some of those voters.
- thrance 2y agoI don't dispute that a lot of republican voters bought into the propaganda that dems were anti-men, but what are the democrats supposed to do? This is completely baseless. I can't recall a single mainstream liberal figure having problematic words on men as a group. Republican speakers on the other hand spew non-stop hate toward every minority I could name and no one cares. If the median voters can't see that (wether he lives in a bubble or simply refuses to acknowledge it), then this country is fucked.