3 ms·
> ruled that the tech giant has illegally maintained a monopoly through the billions of dollars in annual payments it makes to partners Wow. Are they serious?
by deburo 2y ago
> ruled that the tech giant has illegally maintained a monopoly through the billions of dollars in annual payments it makes to partners
Wow. Are they serious? that’s illegal?
- clipsy 2y agoCutting the source off mid-sentence is disingenuous.
- deburo 2y agoFine, I thought the context was obviously Google's search engine monopoly. > ruled that the tech giant has illegally maintained a monopoly through the billions of dollars in annual payments it makes to partners to secure the default search engine position on popular web browsers and mobile phones It's still a stretch by the judge, and this article is a good hint that the ruling may be weak: https://itif.org/publications/2024/08/23/six-weak-spots-judge-mehta-google-decision/ https://itif.org/publications/2024/08/23/six-weak-spots-judg...