6 ms·
I just completed moving my WEB site to Gemini, I find it far easier to maintain. There is a lot of content out in Gemini without the annoyance of the modern WE
by jmclnx 2y ago
I just completed moving my WEB site to Gemini, I find it far easier to maintain. There is a lot of content out in Gemini without the annoyance of the modern WEB.
- superkuh 2y agoHow is it easier to maintain? A website on HTTP/1.1 can be just as simple as one on gemini. Files in directories.
- jmclnx 2y agoNo special tools, I can use vim, Emacs or any text editor to changed files. File format is very simple. With HTTP the formatting is far more complex.
- hermanradtke 2y agoMy markdown file format is really simple too
- hagbard_c 2y agoIn what way is formatting more complex with HTTP? Assuming the mime mappings are set up correctly the HTTP server pushes out the files with the correct content type and with that you can edit your text files with ed for all I care and it will work. The fact that you can do more complex things with HTTP does not mean you should, the aforementioned example of a directory full of files is just as valid as it was when Tim Berners-Lee fired up the first site on his Next cube.
- Brian_K_White 2y agoWhat special tools? Since when is vim a special tool? What special file format? Special file formats exist but none are required. I don't see an answer to the question here.
- superkuh 2y agoNo it's not. That is entirely a choice. My website is just HTML files in directories with other files. The html is handwritten and just <p> and <ul> and the like. I just use a normal text editor. Gemini is not simpler than HTTP/1.1 and writing HTML. Gemini is like forcing yourself to write in Haiku because it constrains you rather than just limiting yourself ... yourself.
- jeffbee 2y agoDo you browse it on your MAC by any chance?
- jmclnx 2y agoOne can use a MAC for gemini, I use UN*X type systems. But gemini renders great on a cell phone using deedum.