This is such an on point post. But I’d add one thing. Peer review is extremely valuable if you use it as a tool for career improvement and not as a tool for pe

This is such an on point post. But I’d add one thing. Peer review is extremely valuable if you use it as a tool for career improvement and not as a tool for performance review. To do that though you need 2 things, trust between the peers and for it to have no way to impact career progression from the companies perspective. So when I was a manager I’d have a rule that at 4 times a year my reports would need to do 2 peer reviews with peers of their choice. Preferably over lunch the company paid for. The only thing I wanted to know is if it happened or not. I got mixed feedback on the method from my reports. I think the ones who saw it as an opportunity to get real unadulterated feedback loved the process, while the rest just got lunch. Which is fine.