3 ms·
There are whole paragraphs from that article that basically says Chinese lie, cheat, and steal to get technology. But without any evidence, E.G: "The prototyp
by Volpe 14y ago
There are whole paragraphs from that article that basically says Chinese lie, cheat, and steal to get technology. But without any evidence, E.G:
"The prototype J-20 Chinese stealth fighter unveiled last year, for example, appears to be based on technology recovered from a US F-117 stealth fighter..."
Appears? It also appears to be a self-developed piece of technology? Why the negative bias? (For no reason).
It's worrying that people can't even spot the bias when it's sitting right in front of them.
wu mao are essentially a product of the CCP's propaganda machine. So of course they shoot down any and everything that isn't pro CCP.
> most reputable unbiased international news agencies
I'm curious which agencies these are? From my own reading, I've found every agency is biased, and the only way to get a useful picture is to understand where their bias lies and read multiple sources.
- seanmcdirmid 14y agoSo you are worried about that one sentence? Does it even cast China in a bad light? It seems smart of them to learn from whatever wreckage they recovered in Serbia. Yes, I don't see much bias there, definitely not the opinion shaping kind of bias that would affect reader thinking. Maybe there are some insecurities that Chinese readers would be sensitive to that would completely escape westerner notice. I should have said "most" unbiased, of course bias is impossible to completely avoid. An article with facts as numbers, which is just reporting observations and not making value judgement, is as unbiased as you can get!