2 ms·

Yes smalltalk and whatnot are supposed to be "real OOP". But today, OOP is just Java's model for most people. Erlang probably got the message passing thing rig

Yes smalltalk and whatnot are supposed to be "real OOP". But today, OOP is just Java's model for most people. Erlang probably got the message passing thing right, but it just doesn't make sense to declare it OOP, today. That is my opinion, that it makes sense to talk about OOP in those terms.

Nursie 2y ago
An opinion at odds with actual definitions. Especially when it comes to “pure” OOP which has a pretty specific definition.
- the_gipsy 2y ago
  When the question is "what has really worked" in the last decades, academical definitions are not important.