3 ms·

Doesn't work, see Brazil vs X. Censorship friendly competitors BlueSky and Threads swooped in and took away X's users and revenue. BlueSky couldn't stop boast

Doesn't work, see Brazil vs X. Censorship friendly competitors BlueSky and Threads swooped in and took away X's users and revenue. BlueSky couldn't stop boasting how many users it got from the fiasco, and their posts were highly upvoted on HN and celebrated.

rembicilious 2y ago
There’s plenty of hate for X on HN and abroad. I don’t think the crowd on HN is going to have the same reaction to Wikimedia taking a hardline stance against censorship. Blocking the world’s foremost encyclopaedia vs blocking an extremely popular gossip app. Sadly, an Indian competitor would appear, probably by ripping off Wikimedia’s own content.
- tomrod 2y ago
  Correct. Because X is controlled by a ideological demogogue who has become the very thing he railed against that never was before him.
- nradov 2y ago
  Anyone can copy Wikimedia content. That is explicitly allowed and not ripping anyone off.
Barrin92 2y ago
Twitter is a private profit seeking company, Wikipedia is a non-profit with the overwhelming majority of its funding coming from the US and EU[1]. Additional users cost them money, they don't bring any so it is in fact baffling that they would comply with something like this. [1]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising/2020-21_Report#/media/File:FY2021-Donations-By-Continent-1.png https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising/2020-21_Report#/...