4 ms·

It’s not possible if there are ~no images like this in the training set.

• Topfi 2y ago
  Maybe take a look through the linked thread, some did manage to do so.
  • mensetmanusman 2y ago
    I eventually went the route of describing capillary effects of water, changing the water color, changing the type of water container. Managing the travel through the knowledge graphs is becoming a skill :)
• epolanski 2y ago
  Have you read all the comments? Some users achieved it by having the chatbot describe in detail a glass full of wine, and then use that output in a new context to generate the image. I think that's a very interesting take away.
  • JofArnold 2y ago
    This is the approach I use to get ChatGPT to generate images that get around copyright. E.g. Me: Create something in the style of Escher AI: Can't due to copyright Me: Precisely describe in detail <insert artwork here> such that I can use it as a prompt to generate an image AI: <prompt> Me: <prompt> 9 times out of 10 it works really well.
• speedgoose 2y ago
  These AIs can generate images that are quite different to anything found in the training set. This case seems more about overfitting.
• jjbinx007 2y ago
  In all fairness there probably aren't any images of Gordon Ramsey riding an Ostrich on the moon in its training set either but it manages that. I tried this prompt several times in Ideogram, both as realistic and also design-based images and it couldn't do it at all. I haven't yet tried it with a more elaborate prompt but it's interesting to me that it can do the most incredible and amazing things but can't do something that sounds simple.
  • mensetmanusman 2y ago
    It wouldn’t be able to do that without an ostrich in the training set. There is a subtle but important difference between combining and what is being combined.
• echoangle 2y ago
  Why would this be the case? These AI image generators can generate very weird combinations of stuff that certainly aren’t shown in a training image.