4 ms·
Here's how I would summarize this (interesting) paper (please correct as appropriate). 1. Assume that consciousness is an illusion of the brain (Illusionism).
by GMoromisato 2y ago
Here's how I would summarize this (interesting) paper (please correct as appropriate).
1. Assume that consciousness is an illusion of the brain (Illusionism). That is, when we see the color red, the brain creates qualia (the feeling of seeing), but it's just an illusion.[a]
2. Why is the brain like that? The Attention Schema Theory (AST) suggests that this helps animals to focus on important inputs. The brain turns certain inputs into qualia (sensations), while ignoring others, to help us focus. Consciousness is kind of a like a blackboard on which certain inputs are placed, which helps higher planning functions to make decisions.
3. Once we have this sense of self, we can infer that other beings also have a sense of self and are able to form social bonds. Moreover, we evolve a morality based on having a sense of self. We believe inflicting pain is morally bad because we don't like feeling pain and can empathize.[b]
4. If Illusionism and AST is true, then it is likely that alien intelligence also evolved in the same way (because of convergent evolution). Therefore, alien intelligence might also have consciousness and might have also developed a moral framework based on consciousness.
5. But what if Artificial General Intelligence is possible? If AGI is possible, then it is likely that alien species quickly transition to a post-biologic state. Even if it takes us another 1,000 years to develop AGI, that's nothing in the lifetime of a species. Any alien intelligence we encounter is likely to be millions of years ahead of us (evolutionarily) and therefore has already developed AGI.[c]
6. Moreover, just as AST is useful in us to efficiently use brain resources, it should be useful in AGI. Thus, AGI might be programmed with (or eventually evolve) consciousness.
7. But such consciousness might be very different from biologically created consciousness and that would lead to misalignment. For example, an AGI might be nihilistic and not think consciousness is special. From their perspective, killing a human would be no different than disassembling a laptop.
---------------
[a]: This is in contrast to theories that say that qualia/consciousness is some unique (and unknown) physical process. For example, Roger Penrose thinks qualia is some kind of quantum mechanical effects (I personally think that's bordering on pseudoscience, but what do I know).
[b]: Consciousness is intertwined with free will here. You can't have free will without consciousness (cars don't have free will) and if you have consciousness, you have free will (at least as far as humans are concerned). And free will is the basis of all morality. You can't hold someone responsible unless they have free will. And thus, you can't hold someone responsible unless they have consciousness.
[c]: Alien civilizations can't be millions of years behind us because then they wouldn't have technology. And they can't be equally advanced because in a universe that is 12 billion years old, having two civilizations the same age would be an awful coincidence.
- saaaaaam 2y agoThough I guess [c] is more likely to be true if “any alien intelligence we encounter” means they come to us, rather than us finding them!
- GMoromisato 2y agoAgreed! But if aliens visited Earth in the past, how far back could they visit and still conclude that we're intelligent? 2000 years? Absolutely, that's Roman Empire times and we would absolutely count as an intelligent civilization. 20,000 years? Maybe. This is before agriculture, but we'd still be animals making tools and even boats. 200,000 years? I'm not sure we would be distinguishable from modern apes. So the window is around 200,000 years, which is about 0.004% of the age of the Earth, and 0.04% of the time Earth has had multicellular life. If we visit a planet that has multicellular life, what's the chance that we will visit exactly in the 200,000 year window when they have technology similar to ours? Most likely we'll either visit too early (before civilization and even intelligence) or millions of years after the first civilization.
- munch117 2y ago> You can't have free will without consciousness Sure you can. Being consciously aware of a having made a decision does not mean that consciousness was a prerequisite for having made the decision. And then there's all the decisions that we make without being consciously aware of them at all.
- GMoromisato 2y agoWe're just arguing definitions at this point, and I grant that my definition of free will requires consciousness. You're right to ask whether that is the only possible definition of free will. For my purposes, though, I use free will in the context of morality and culpability. And you definitely can't have moral culpability without free will, which is why neither animals nor the insane can be culpable of crimes. And you can't have moral culpability without consciousness. If I kill someone while sleepwalking, I would likely be found not guilty.
- 2y ago