5 ms·
> Although the penicillin family of antibiotics is highly effective against strep A, many Ugandan families instead visit traditional healers, whose treatments i
by lqstuart 2y ago
> Although the penicillin family of antibiotics is highly effective against strep A, many Ugandan families instead visit traditional healers, whose treatments include scraping tonsils with a spoon or a sharp piece of wood until they bleed. If parents do seek out antibiotics, they might just buy two pills of penicillin, not the full course necessary to clear an infection.
Think this is the problem they should be solving before trying to immunize people against bacteria that lives literally everywhere
- bjelkeman-again 2y agoIn other words, poverty is the real problem.
- Spooky23 2y agoIgnorance is the problem. Plenty of wealthy people are taking horse deworming medicine for political purposes.
- throawayonthe 2y ago[dead]
- carlmr 2y agoA mix of both, the poverty creates some of this ignorance by lack of access to education. That people in the US choose to be ignorant despite having an education happens, but it's rarer than where there is no education.
- more_corn 2y agoMy mother was educated. She bought into some misinformation and fear-mongering about modern medicine and rejected it entirely. No vaccines no doctors. Mostly it was fine till it wasn’t. I took myself to a doctor as a teen with bad strep. Not our doctor we didn’t have one. just a doctor. No insurance. They could see I was in rough shape. They just diagnosed me with strep (although I already knew that’s what it was) and sent me away with a prescription. I didn’t even realize how weird that was till much later. (That they saw me with no insurance and no previous relationship and no payment) My sister was in town once years later and my younger brother was in such bad shape she took him to a doctor. She swears to this day he would have died. Again strep. Misinformation is a big problem. People who buy into it put their kids at risk. When we allow purveyors of nonsense to thrive because “freedoms” we do everyone a disservice.
- tomcam 2y ago> Plenty of wealthy people are taking horse deworming medicine for political purposes. Don’t understand this
- tim333 2y agoThis I think https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/covid-ivermectin-study-jama-malaysia-b2018597.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/covid-iver... Though that was a bit 2020. Not sure it still goes on.
- jart 2y agoThey still do. They think it's a magic salve that cures everything, even cancer. Which is sad because for many of them it's probably the only health care they have access to. The way the media reacts to this stuff only makes things sadder.
- tomcam 2y agoThe “they” being wealthy people? I am skeptical. I know many of them.
- Spooky23 2y agoPeople on the margins distrust authority, see themselves as knowing better, and resent the “mainstream” system for different reasons. Think of the folks who think RFK Jr is some sort of breath of fresh air. Or the people into Gwyneth Paltrow faux “wellness” nonsense and homeopathy. On the more reactionary side, you have people who idolize the cowboy myth, the 1950s, or interpret freedom as meaning “I don’t pay taxes”. It’s the same psychological feature, realized through different perceptions.
- tomcam 2y agoInteresting. It won the Nobel prize for human applications long before it was considered a veterinary drug so I am still puzzled.
- Ekaros 2y ago[flagged]
- Fomite 2y agoPublic health tends to prefer the Swiss cheese model of prevention - increased access to antibiotics, trust building in communities, and promoting access to healthcare all occur simultaneously. But vaccines are very effective.
- thaumasiotes 2y agoPublic health tends to take the view that access to antibiotics is already too high, not too low.
- IanCal 2y agoNot in the example given there.
- carlmr 2y agoIt is, it's preferable to have no antibiotics than not enough antibiotics. This only creates resistant strains and doesn't heal people.
- IanCal 2y agoIs it preferable to have none or enough?
- carlmr 2y agoEnough is obviously good, there's plenty of stuff where you need antibiotics to heal. Enough can be bad if abused, since some doctors overprescribe antibiotics for cases where it's not warranted, e.g. a cold. Most colds are viral in any case, so all you're doing is weakening the patient even more. Aside from that there may be severe side-effects, so it's best only to use antibiotics if you know you have a bacterial issue that can be solved with them. None is preferable to partial treatments, since a partial treatment will create resistant strains and not much else.
- Fomite 2y ago
- isodev 2y agoI think the opposite... instead of going through the trouble of making people change their ways (which we know is hard and takes generations) instead we eliminate the root cause. Sounds efficient to me.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- lqstuart 2y agoThat’s because you don’t understand what group A strep is or what it means to eliminate it