> Is there an argument for why infinitely sophisticated autocomplete is not dangerous? It's definitely not dangerous in the sense of reaching true intelligence

> Is there an argument for why infinitely sophisticated autocomplete is not dangerous? It's definitely not dangerous in the sense of reaching true intelligence/consciousness that would be a threat to us or force us to face the ethics of whether AI deserves dignity, freedom, etc. It's very dangerous in the sense in that it will be just "good enough" to replace human labor with so that we all end up with shitter customer service, education, medical care, etc. so that the top 0.1% can get richer. And you're right, it's also dangerous in the sense that responsibilty for evil acts will be laundered to it.