3 ms·

Do you think it's possible to make the conversation adversarial or is that against the guardrails?

• simonw 2y ago
  I'd be very surprised if they had that completely airtight, I bet we'll see some examples of people breaking that soon. Hah, just found this on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/notebooklm/comments/1g64iyi/holy_shit_listeners_notebooklm_can_generate_18/ https://www.reddit.com/r/notebooklm/comments/1g64iyi/holy_sh... - many f-bombs.
  • ozozozd 2y ago
    That feels/sounds so natural. It’s amazing how it doesn’t occur to OpenAI and others that the “safety guardrails” really dilute the output. And it’s a display of conservatism. Bizarre to think that in America AI couldn’t swear. Until today, where Google allowed the AI to behave as the lord intended.
    • seanhunter 2y ago
      Why do you think it doesn't occur to them? I'm genuinely curious. It seems to me these alignment questions are a conscious trade-off between giving users what they ask for and brand safety knowing that every spicy output will immediately find its way to twitter/reddit/etc.
• zer0c00ler 2y ago
  [dead]