> If you can't grok an analogy, that's on you. Please review and respect the HN guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycomb

> If you can't grok an analogy, that's on you. Please review and respect the HN guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > 1975: Don't bother writing MicroSoft BASIC. The customer base is miniscule. You're cherry-picking a single success, with the benefit of hindsight. How about listing all of the nascent technologies from 1975? It's likely that many of them flopped, and investing in them was a waste. > if your company, or its leadership, lack vision for the future and only invest in the present I am my company, a sole proprietor with very limited resources. I do invest in the future to some extent, but I can't invest in every possible future. The Vision Pro future does not look particularly promising. Besides, you don't need to be first to be successful. I certainly wasn't the first to any platform, not even close. The thing about hockey is, there's only one puck on the ice. And it's a zero-sum game, one winner and one loser. But that's not even remotely true of tech.