3 ms·
Legally binding is a nebulous concept when you're some of the world's richest companies with legal departments multiple times larger than the entire staff of th
by denkmoon 2y ago
Legally binding is a nebulous concept when you're some of the world's richest companies with legal departments multiple times larger than the entire staff of the companies you're 'legally bound' with.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Legally binding is a nebulous concept when you're some of the world's richest companies The flip side of being rich enough to hire good counsel is being rich enough to be worth going after. Were Google to renege on an agreement such as this, there would be a line of litigation financiers standing to buy the claim.
- asdf000333 2y agoUnless it's not actually Google but some shell company Google is technically a customer of. But either way, I don't imagine the intent is to bail on the agreement.
- bpodgursky 2y agoThat extremely large and competent legal departments is going to tell you this: "Taking this to court will cost you a bajillion dollars. And you'll lose. Cut the antics and pay them off."