3 ms·
In the US, there certainly is. The rule doesn't mention encryption specifically, it just prohibits "encoding for the purpose of obscuring meaning". The intent i
by threemux 2y ago
In the US, there certainly is. The rule doesn't mention encryption specifically, it just prohibits "encoding for the purpose of obscuring meaning". The intent is what matters not the method.
- DoctorOetker 2y agowould oblivious transfer qualify as OK? if the sender provably doesn't know what's transmitted, will the law rule it a form of obscuring meaning?
- sidewndr46 2y agoYou're thinking criminal court standards, like beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction. It's a procedural thing. The FCC will tell you did it & tell you the penalties. Your options are zero.
- agiacalone 2y agoYes, the FCC would (theoretically) just revoke your license to prevent you from doing it again if they so wanted.
- userbinator 2y agoDo they also prohibit sarcasm?