6 ms·

Don’t casually suggest “mental breakdown” for people and situations you do not know or have first party insight to. First, blaming things on “mental breakdowns

Don’t casually suggest “mental breakdown” for people and situations you do not know or have first party insight to. First, blaming things on “mental breakdowns” is incredibly lazy and shallow and belittles the struggle that people with mental illness have. Did you ever stop to think that maybe this guy is just greedy, or an incompetent CEO?

baggy_trough 2y ago
Yes but I think it’s more likely he is having a mental breakdown.
- williamstein 2y ago
  Matt said in his keynote that he had a kidney stone a few weeks ago, which is evidently extremely painful. Perhaps that physical trauma triggered something.
  - Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 2y ago
    I am not in the mood to do the proper base rate computations but I think it's considerably less likely that this would be indirectly due to a kidney stone rather than simply any of the well known psychiatric and neurologic condition you can have at the age of ~50.
ookblah 2y ago
he could be all of them? i'm basing this off the fact that he was able to run and build it up to what it is today, then suddenly going off the rails. more of me grasping at an explanation than a declaration of truth heh.
Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 2y ago
Well, an essential part of psychiatric diagnosis is often to notice the presence of a noticeable before/after change. Psychosis, mania, are valid hypothesis that would make a CEO take surprising decision. I don't see how that belittles the struggle of patients. Having and company and being bipolar is far from life on easy mode. Greed and incompetence are also valid hypothesis, although don't necessarily need an abrupt change in behavior.
- purple-leafy 2y ago
  So now you are diagnosing the guy as bipolar? Based on what?
  - Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 2y ago
    I am not. I am saying this is a hypothesis to consider. This is not at all the same thing and I would agree with you that diagnosing bipolar on a few press articles makes no sense. The goldwater rule is a good rule imo.

baggy_trough 2y ago

Yes but I think it’s more likely he is having a mental breakdown.

williamstein 2y ago
Matt said in his keynote that he had a kidney stone a few weeks ago, which is evidently extremely painful. Perhaps that physical trauma triggered something.
- Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 2y ago
  I am not in the mood to do the proper base rate computations but I think it's considerably less likely that this would be indirectly due to a kidney stone rather than simply any of the well known psychiatric and neurologic condition you can have at the age of ~50.

ookblah 2y ago

he could be all of them? i'm basing this off the fact that he was able to run and build it up to what it is today, then suddenly going off the rails. more of me grasping at an explanation than a declaration of truth heh.

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 2y ago

Well, an essential part of psychiatric diagnosis is often to notice the presence of a noticeable before/after change. Psychosis, mania, are valid hypothesis that would make a CEO take surprising decision. I don't see how that belittles the struggle of patients. Having and company and being bipolar is far from life on easy mode. Greed and incompetence are also valid hypothesis, although don't necessarily need an abrupt change in behavior.

purple-leafy 2y ago
So now you are diagnosing the guy as bipolar? Based on what?
- Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 2y ago
  I am not. I am saying this is a hypothesis to consider. This is not at all the same thing and I would agree with you that diagnosing bipolar on a few press articles makes no sense. The goldwater rule is a good rule imo.