7 ms·
I saw there is a manifest v3 ublock lite. I don't understand why and how it would be less capable, and so far I have not read the details of how/why. So far,
by jokoon 2y ago
I saw there is a manifest v3 ublock lite.
I don't understand why and how it would be less capable, and so far I have not read the details of how/why.
So far, it's just rumors to me.
I will keep using firefox anyway, but honestly I am still waiting for a clearer explanation.
- kristofferR 2y agoYou can't just call stuff you simply don't bother to look up "rumors". Read up here: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ) https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-as...
- sjnonweb 2y agoWith manifest v2, the extension could dynamically intercept requests and block them based on a custom rule. With v3, extensions have to predefine the rules for blocking. Which is the limiting factor
- hypeatei 2y agoThat and certain features like the element zapper in uBO aren't available in Lite.
- sho 2y ago> extensions have to predefine the rules for blockin And there's a limit of 5000 such rules.
- nolist_policy 2y agoThe limit is 330000 rules: "Based on input from the extension community, we also increased the number of rulesets for declarativeNetRequest, allowing extensions to bundle up to 330,000 static rules and dynamically add a further 30,000." https://blog.chromium.org/2024/05/manifest-v2-phase-out-begins.html#:~:text=Based%20on%20input%20from%20the%20extension%20community%2C%20we%20also%20increased%20the%20number%20of%20rulesets%20for%20declarativeNetRequest%2C%20allowing%20extensions%20to%20bundle%20up%20to%20330%2C000%20static%20rules%20and%20dynamically%20add%20a%20further%2030%2C000 https://blog.chromium.org/2024/05/manifest-v2-phase-out-begi....
- byteknight 2y agoSo because you don't understand it, its rumors? A Simple google search would answer all of your questions in a literal sentence. It removes APIs used by ad blockers. https://gprivate.com/6dp1q https://gprivate.com/6dp1q