3 ms·
We didn't expect the rate of oncogenesis from off-target gene insertion. It's bad news. At the same time, this is a treatment for a terrible, terrible disease
by mlyle 2y ago
We didn't expect the rate of oncogenesis from off-target gene insertion. It's bad news.
At the same time, this is a treatment for a terrible, terrible disease; so far the consequences seem smaller than what cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy would deal out on its own.
So it's bad news about something which is probably still a good therapy (but we sure would like a better one).
- LarsDu88 2y agoAnother takeaway, particularly for the HN crowd is that gene therapy both works and still has some major kinks to iron out