4 ms·
This prize is more of a settler colonialist land grab by physicists. ML is just a subfield of physics (like every other field), so let's make sure that everyone
by scarmig 2y ago
This prize is more of a settler colonialist land grab by physicists. ML is just a subfield of physics (like every other field), so let's make sure that everyone knows that it's in our domain.
Speaking as a onetime physicist now in ML...
- CamperBob2 2y agoEh, I doubt Hinton would have won if he hadn't turned to alarmism in his dotage. The prizes are as political these days as they are scientific.
- Der_Einzige 2y agoMath, Logic, Epistemology, et al are not "subfields of physics" - The other way around is more likely.
- frotaur 2y agoI also had this view, but thinking a bit more about it, what we consider 'reasonable axioms' in math, all come more or less from our logical intuition. Which was built from our evolution, which respects the laws of physics. This has changed my point of view to where math is kinda derived from physics, as the axioms (but even the derivation rules, like modus ponens) are chosen because they respect what feels intuitively 'logical'. But this intuition cannot be disentangled from physics, as it was a product of physics.
- llm_trw 2y agoI mean mainstream maths sure, that doesn't mean you can't replace the axioms with one's that aren't.
- dekhn 2y agomachine learning is math, not physics. physics uses math, not the other way around. ML can be used in any field of science, not vice versa.
- wing_rets 2y agoThe actual process of computation, sure, but machine learning was born from physics-based methods and applications to understand complexity and disorder.
- dekhn 2y agoI think ML depended on math/statistics/computing much more than physics. It's much easier to see what Hopfield and Hinton did as inspired by mathematical models that were created to help study statistical mechanics. Which is fine and just shows how stochastic scientific discovery is.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- RamblingCTO 2y agoIt's compsci, but nice try.
- dekhn 2y agoComputer science is math. Just math.
- theGnuMe 2y agoI would agree.. But it took Computer Scientists to put neural networks on the map by getting them to scale. Basically by asking the question what happens if we turn it up to 11. Statisticians would never have done that due to parsimony and something something Bayesian. Engineers would never have done it, nor mathematicians either. It took Computer Scientists because it is computation.