3 ms·
>If I grab a series of photos from shutterstock, run them through a generative AI photo enhance process to improve the white balance, contrast and levels is tha
by ninetyninenine 2y ago
>If I grab a series of photos from shutterstock, run them through a generative AI photo enhance process to improve the white balance, contrast and levels is that adequate enough to be considered "copyright free"?
Hard to say. If I had the generative AI copy the photo but change the time of day and angle then would it be copying?
What if I went to the same location and changed the angle and the time of day? Would that be copying?
AI is essentially "drawing" the same photo from a different time and angle. What if I did the same thing photorealistic-ally by hand in photoshop? Would I be copying if I painted the picture in the same way the AI did it??
I want you to consider what I'm doing here with my reply. I am admitting to a crime right now. What I have done with this reply is literally rip off different vocabulary words and certain short phrases from books all over the world and mixed up those words and phrases to produce the reply here. I am ADMITTING to copying those books.
You going to accuse me of a crime even if I admitted to it? No. But if I did the same thing with AI.... you going to accuse me then?
- amelius 2y agoYour argument is based on a series of slippery slopes that I'm sure a judge would not tread on.
- ninetyninenine 2y agoI didn't even make an argument. I'm saying it's not clear cut.