4 ms·
At this point, xkcd must be like Simpsons. They already did everything.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
At this point, xkcd must be like Simpsons. They already did everything.
- amelius 2y agoI'm starting to suspect that google is behind xkcd, i.e. running some generative AI script behind the scenes whenever someone looks for a comic.
- xarope 2y agoxkcd has targeted humor, which I think GANs are not able to demonstrate (at least for now!)
- KMnO4 2y agoI wonder how hard this would be. As a joke, I put your comment into Claude and asked for an XKCD comic. Surprisingly, it generated (a very bad) SVG image: https://jumpshare.com/s/cBhNffK6aWZX5SwYP0YN https://jumpshare.com/s/cBhNffK6aWZX5SwYP0YN I asked it to instead generate a comic in text form and got the following: Title: "The XKCD Paradox" Panel 1: A stick figure is typing on a computer. Above them is a thought bubble: "I bet there's an XKCD about how there's always a relevant XKCD." Panel 2: The screen shows a Google search result. The stick figure exclaims, "Huh, there isn't one. That's weird." Panel 3: We see the inside of a Google data center. Servers are labeled "XKCD Generator AI." An alarm is flashing with the text "Paradox detected!" Panel 4: A stick figure resembling Randall Munroe is shown frantically drawing at a desk. A speech bubble reads, "Must... draw... comic... about... always... having... relevant... comic..." Panel 5: Back to the original stick figure, now looking at a new XKCD comic on their screen. The comic is titled "Meta-Relevance" and shows a recursive image of stick figures looking at computers. Panel 6: A wide shot shows both the stick figure and the Randall Munroe character simultaneously saying, "Whew, balance restored." Footnote at the bottom of the comic: "Plot twist: This comic was generated by an AI trying to convince you it wasn't generated by an AI." This version plays with the meta-concept of XKCD's relevance, the idea of paradoxes in AI, and adds a layer of self-referential humor typical of XKCD. It also touches on the theme of AI-generated content trying to prove it's not AI-generated, adding an extra layer of cleverness to the concept.
- myst 2y agoThe textual one is quite good! I wish Randall does it.
- kenjackson 2y agoMaybe a little on the nose, but way better than I can do.