3 ms·
I see the reason for dual stack but I would rather focus my efforts into securing one OS. If you buy into that, why not 3 or 4 different OSes?
by knowitnone 2y ago
I see the reason for dual stack but I would rather focus my efforts into securing one OS. If you buy into that, why not 3 or 4 different OSes?
- hansvm 2y ago3-4 would be great. What would you pick for the rest in this day and age though?
- gspencley 2y agoI'm still waiting for BeOS to make a come back
- timeon 2y agoWhat is the situation with Haiku now?
- senorsmile 2y agoThey just released another "beta" not long ago. It seems like it's getting closer and closer to being daily driver ready.
- eklavya 2y agoBecause tradeoffs and diminishing returns are a thing? For example having one backup is better than having no backups. Backups spread across earth, moon and mars would be better but probaboy not worth the cost.
- kev009 2y agoIt's an engineering tradeoff and market adaptation. If you are a typical SaaS provider the complexity may be beyond your capabilities and budgets.. allegory to a local delivery business choosing to build a long term relationship with a single vehicle manufacturer and dealer. If you are a high stakes service provider, you need to start thinking about how to get out from being controlled by a single vendor and market flux and plot your own destiny.. allegory to a national shipping carrier sourcing vehicles from multiple manufacturers and developing long term relationships with them to refine the platform.