5 ms·
Some of these look really obviously bad, like the guy spinning the fire and the girl running along the beach. And it completely failed at the bubbles
by voidUpdate 2y ago
Some of these look really obviously bad, like the guy spinning the fire and the girl running along the beach. And it completely failed at the bubbles
- Quarrelsome 2y agodoesn't need to be movie quality, just needs to be tiktok quality and this totally passes the bar. Are you ready to become a penguin in all of your posts to maximise aquatic engagement? I am.
- voidUpdate 2y agoI've become a robot and a demon to maximise engagement, its called being a vtuber
- nsagent 2y agoInteresting perspective, considering a paper ByteDance just released yesterday [1] has much worse video quality. If your comparison is to real videos, then for sure the quality isn't great. If instead you compare to other released research, the this model is one of the best released thus far. [1]: https://epiphqny.github.io/Loong-video/ https://epiphqny.github.io/Loong-video/
- add-sub-mul-div 2y agoOkay, let's give it a participation trophy for being the best of the slop category.
- beezlebroxxxxxx 2y agoYeah, some were impressive, but others looked quite bad. The guy running in the desert looked like a guy floating over the ground only sporadically making contact with the sand. The footfalls in a lot of these videos look pretty janky or "soft". The clothing changes also have pretty rough edges, or just look like they're floating over the original model. The 3D glasses one looked atrocious. The lighting changes are also pretty lacking.
- Bloedcoins 2y agoI have not had the same feeling as you and i do look at ai art for quite. awhile. Are you still impressed though?
- tiborsaas 2y agoThe spinning fire was one that could easily fool me if a 0.5 shot was in a music video. Context is everything.