3 ms·

Pretty smart model. Here's one I made: https://replicate.com/p/6ez0x8xqvsrga0cjadg8m7bah0 https://replicate.com/p/6ez0x8xqvsrga0cjadg8m7bah0

by ilaksh 2y ago

loufe 2y ago
That is astoundingly good adherence to the description. I already liked and was impressed by Flux1 but that is perhaps the most impressive image generation I've ever seen.
- miohtama 2y ago
  Is it going be able to go head-to-head against Midjourney?
  - vunderba 2y ago
    MJ is by far the worst model for complex prompt ADHERENCE, though it has excellent compositional quality. Comparisons of similar prompt using Midjourney 6.1 https://imgur.com/a/WBnPl7I https://imgur.com/a/WBnPl7I Also, flux (schnell, dev) can be run on your local machine. If you really want to use a paid service, Ideogram is probably the best one out there that balances quality with adherence. DALL-E 3 also has good adherence as well though the quality can sometimes be iffy, and it's very puritanical in terms of censorship.
drdaeman 2y ago
Yet, it doesn't seem to know how a Tektronix 4010 actually looks like... ;) I had similar issues trying to paint a "I cast non-magic missile" meme with a fantasy wizard using a missile launcher. No model out there (I've tried SD, SDXL, FLUX.1dev and now this FLUX1.1pro) knows how a missile launcher looks like (neither as a generic term, nor any specific systems) and even has no clue how it's held, so they all draw really weird contraptions.
- morbicer 2y ago
  Isn't it because the shoulder launched weapon is usually called rocket launcher, rpg or bazooka? Never heard it referred as misille launcher.
  - drdaeman 2y ago
    I've tried all of those and then some (e.g. "ATGM"), plus various specific names (like "FGM-148 Javelin", "M1 Bazooka", or "RPG-7", which are all quite iconic and well-recognized so I thought some of those may appear in training data) - all no bueno. Models are simply unaware about such devices, best of their "guesses" is that it's a weapon, so they draw something rifle- or pistol-shaped. And, sure, that's what LoRAs are for. If I can figure out how to train one for FLUX, in a way that would actually produce something meaningful (my pitiful attempts at SDXL LoRA training were... less that stellar, and FLUX is quite different from everything). Although that's probably not worth it for making a meme picture...
PcChip 2y ago
agreed - pretty impressive! https://replicate.com/p/ajfrva4p4hrge0cjaf3bncfwn4 https://replicate.com/p/ajfrva4p4hrge0cjaf3bncfwn4
nikcub 2y ago
I've gone from counting fingers on a hand to keys on a keyboard
loxias 2y ago
It's quite good at following a detailed paragraph long description of an scene, which is a double edged sword. A lot of the fun for me with early text to image models was underspecifying an image and then enjoying how the model "invents" it. "Steampunk spaceship", "communist bear", "glass city". flux is amazing, but I find it requires a very literal description, which pushes the "creative work" back to the text itself. Which can certainly be a good thing, just a bit less gratifying to non visual types like myself. :) I wonder, only somewhat jokingly, if one could make text generators which "imagine" detailed fantastical scenes, suitable for feeding to a text to image model.
- vunderba 2y ago
  That's what Fooocus is - it allows you to specify a "text expander" LLM that sits in between the input prompt and the diffusion model. https://github.com/lllyasviel/Fooocus https://github.com/lllyasviel/Fooocus
- ilaksh 2y ago
  Prompt enhancement is now a standard feature in many image generation tools.
jug 2y ago
One thing that makes FLUX so special is the prompt understanding. I now gave FLUX 1.1 a prompt "Closeup of a doll house built to resemble a famous room in the TV show Friends" and it gave me one with the sign "Central Perk". I never prompted for the text "Central Perk". A Redditor also discovered that it has an associative understanding of emotions. For example "Rose of passion" and it may draw a flower that is burning, because passion is fiery. This is miles ahead of most other image generation models available today.

Pretty smart model. Here's one I made: https://replicate.com/p/6ez0x8xqvsrga0cjadg8m7bah0 https://replicate.com/p/6ez0x8xqvsrga0cjadg8m7bah0

by ilaksh 2y ago

Pretty smart model. Here's one I made: https://replicate.com/p/6ez0x8xqvsrga0cjadg8m7bah0 https://replicate.com/p/6ez0x8xqvsrga0cjadg8m7bah0

loufe 2y ago

That is astoundingly good adherence to the description. I already liked and was impressed by Flux1 but that is perhaps the most impressive image generation I've ever seen.

miohtama 2y ago
Is it going be able to go head-to-head against Midjourney?
- vunderba 2y ago
  MJ is by far the worst model for complex prompt ADHERENCE, though it has excellent compositional quality. Comparisons of similar prompt using Midjourney 6.1 https://imgur.com/a/WBnPl7I https://imgur.com/a/WBnPl7I Also, flux (schnell, dev) can be run on your local machine. If you really want to use a paid service, Ideogram is probably the best one out there that balances quality with adherence. DALL-E 3 also has good adherence as well though the quality can sometimes be iffy, and it's very puritanical in terms of censorship.

drdaeman 2y ago

Yet, it doesn't seem to know how a Tektronix 4010 actually looks like... ;) I had similar issues trying to paint a "I cast non-magic missile" meme with a fantasy wizard using a missile launcher. No model out there (I've tried SD, SDXL, FLUX.1dev and now this FLUX1.1pro) knows how a missile launcher looks like (neither as a generic term, nor any specific systems) and even has no clue how it's held, so they all draw really weird contraptions.

morbicer 2y ago
Isn't it because the shoulder launched weapon is usually called rocket launcher, rpg or bazooka? Never heard it referred as misille launcher.
- drdaeman 2y ago
  I've tried all of those and then some (e.g. "ATGM"), plus various specific names (like "FGM-148 Javelin", "M1 Bazooka", or "RPG-7", which are all quite iconic and well-recognized so I thought some of those may appear in training data) - all no bueno. Models are simply unaware about such devices, best of their "guesses" is that it's a weapon, so they draw something rifle- or pistol-shaped. And, sure, that's what LoRAs are for. If I can figure out how to train one for FLUX, in a way that would actually produce something meaningful (my pitiful attempts at SDXL LoRA training were... less that stellar, and FLUX is quite different from everything). Although that's probably not worth it for making a meme picture...

PcChip 2y ago

agreed - pretty impressive! https://replicate.com/p/ajfrva4p4hrge0cjaf3bncfwn4 https://replicate.com/p/ajfrva4p4hrge0cjaf3bncfwn4

nikcub 2y ago

I've gone from counting fingers on a hand to keys on a keyboard

loxias 2y ago

It's quite good at following a detailed paragraph long description of an scene, which is a double edged sword. A lot of the fun for me with early text to image models was underspecifying an image and then enjoying how the model "invents" it. "Steampunk spaceship", "communist bear", "glass city". flux is amazing, but I find it requires a very literal description, which pushes the "creative work" back to the text itself. Which can certainly be a good thing, just a bit less gratifying to non visual types like myself. :) I wonder, only somewhat jokingly, if one could make text generators which "imagine" detailed fantastical scenes, suitable for feeding to a text to image model.

vunderba 2y ago
That's what Fooocus is - it allows you to specify a "text expander" LLM that sits in between the input prompt and the diffusion model. https://github.com/lllyasviel/Fooocus https://github.com/lllyasviel/Fooocus
ilaksh 2y ago
Prompt enhancement is now a standard feature in many image generation tools.

jug 2y ago

One thing that makes FLUX so special is the prompt understanding. I now gave FLUX 1.1 a prompt "Closeup of a doll house built to resemble a famous room in the TV show Friends" and it gave me one with the sign "Central Perk". I never prompted for the text "Central Perk". A Redditor also discovered that it has an associative understanding of emotions. For example "Rose of passion" and it may draw a flower that is burning, because passion is fiery. This is miles ahead of most other image generation models available today.