6 ms·
This is the same developer whose Apollo app got screwed by Reddit. They seem to have a talent for finding simple ways to improve things in new contexts. Unfortu
by sonofhans 2y ago
This is the same developer whose Apollo app got screwed by Reddit. They seem to have a talent for finding simple ways to improve things in new contexts. Unfortunately, their improvements are typically of benefit to _actual users_, and the services in question would rather treat users as grist for the mill.
It’s unjust, and I believe it’s short-sighted.
- minimaxir 2y agoA similar sequence of events happened to Jase Morrissey, who developed Alien Blue for Reddit in 2010, although in that case Reddit was more gracious and acquired the app in before killing it in favor of their own: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_Blue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_Blue He then made Jasmine, a YouTube client which was an order of magnitude better than the official YouTube app...which was then killed for the same reasons as Juno.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoTech's really shifted from the days where an idea like Juno would get your app acquired, and possibly get you hired under their wing to help improve the base product. That's when you can really tell the hacker mentality left big tech.
- godzillabrennus 2y agoIt’s been said before on here that the MBAs have won in big tech and I think that’s fair.
- appendix-rock 2y agoThis sort of tribalism is utterly insufferable. “The good decisions? They were us! And the bad ones? They were made by those idiots over there!”
- tpoacher 2y agoCalm down, Google.
- randomdata 2y agoWhen the zero interest rates left, at least.
- namlem 2y agoAnd Lina Kahn came in
- fhdsgbbcaA 2y agoAre you suggesting Lina is on the side of big Tech?
- s17n 2y agoHe's suggesting that acquisitions aren't happening because of antitrust enforcement. I'm pretty sure that has no bearing on the type of tiny acquisition we're talking about here but then again I don't actually know what I'm talking about.
- Alupis 2y agoI still don't understand the Apollo collapse. The creator seemed to have convinced themselves that their users would not be willing to pay to continue using the app - despite the outpouring of love Apollo enjoyed. It all seemed very short sighted and emotional.
- keyle 2y agoWhen things turn sour, sometimes you have to see the writing on the wall and think years in the future. It may not be something you signed up for. There is also a limit to which people are willing to put themselves through.
- Alupis 2y agoOk, but it was inevitable Reddit wouldn't offer free services to businesses making profit off of their content forever. The creator must have wondered at some point how long the free gravy was going to continue flowing? Why no exit plan of any kind, or even an attempt?
- djxfade 2y agoI never understood why Reddit couldn’t just have kept the API free, and embedded ads in the feed directly. They would get their ad revenue, and third party developers would actually help them make money.
- Alupis 2y agoProbably because it would be easy to filter those ads from the feeds. The facts were businesses like Apollo built themselves upon Reddit's value-proposition. The content is what the users wanted - and Reddit had the content. Apollo's value-add was making that content more accessible to users - at Reddit's expense. We can debate how Reddit handled the rollout - but the facts are businesses like Apollo offered little to Reddit in exchange for Reddit's content. People operating businesses based on someone else's data (moat) should have an exit plan for when the free ride ends.
- throwaway48476 2y agoPlatforms exist for the benefit of platforms, not users.
- yoyohello13 2y ago"short-sighted" is a euphemism used a lot to describe company behavior. We should just call it what it is, anti-social greed.
- pixelready 2y agoI think focusing on the timeline is correct though. There is such a thing as pro-social greed, which is to say: a desire for a product/service/company to be long lived through sustainability of their business model. The problem, I think, stems largely from “shareholder value” theories which force executives to operate solely on a quarterly mindset. When all low hanging fruit in a market has been harvested, those held accountable for value extraction are pushed into short term, unsustainable tactics so that every quarter key metrics can go up regardless of the underlying reality. Hence: layoffs and enshittification.