Of course. The goal is better than nothing, because the consequences of flaws in software are diffuse and not acutely damaging, most of the time. When it comes

Of course. The goal is better than nothing, because the consequences of flaws in software are diffuse and not acutely damaging, most of the time. When it comes to things that can malfunction with immediately deadly consequences, then we make it work flawlessly. Just look at the average kitchen appliance -- very likely to malfunction. Your car breaks? Not nearly as much. It's a shame because human beings tend to ignore the buildup of diffuse consequences until they become horribly acute (climate change).