3 ms·
You're wrong, git is simpler. I mean it has a simpler architecture, a simpler foundation. This simpler architecture means some changes in your habits and, becau
by gbog 14y ago
You're wrong, git is simpler. I mean it has a simpler architecture, a simpler foundation. This simpler architecture means some changes in your habits and, because it is a new tool, an interface that is a bit rough on the edges.
- Dylan16807 14y agoGit simpler? I really don't see how. SVN is focused on having one branch, canonical copy on the server, and you have two big buttons to pull down the newest updates to your copy and also to put your own updates into the master.
- mitjak 14y agoThat seems intuitive because you're used to such a workflow. As someone who started out with git and then learnt about SVN, I found the non-distributed approach somewhat puzzling and limiting.
- Dylan16807 14y agoI've used git much more than SVN. SVN's model is definitely limiting but it's very simple.