10 ms·
>community they usually deal with is not exactly great You mean their paying customers/donators? >But as seen here it can be also extremely destructive positi
by Rinzler89 2y ago
>community they usually deal with is not exactly great
You mean their paying customers/donators?
>But as seen here it can be also extremely destructive position.
That's why you should vet those people and not let in those wishing to use their new position to put down others based on disagreements on personal belief.
- talldayo 2y agoThis is why no professional organization should conduct themselves on X (or Twitter), period. Open Source software can say stupid shit and still get used because it's actually superior to paid alternatives (eg. MPV). Godot is lucky - if they were a real business, they might have to worry about offending people on the internet.
- charlieyu1 2y agoPlenty of organisations used Twitter to promote their stuff for good.
- talldayo 2y agoAnd now they use X, to self-promote their brand to extremists and misinformed critics.
- Rinzler89 2y ago>Godot is lucky No matter how lucky you are, everyone's luck streak eventually comes to an end sooner or later.
- talldayo 2y agoI'm mortified. What could possibly become of my favorite MIT-licensed software product now? Has any Open Source product (besides Wordpress, be fair) self-destructed themselves on Twitter before? I didn't use Twitter but none come to mind.