5 ms·
I've even grown to enjoy spelling and grammar mistakes - at least I know a human wrote it.
by walthamstow 2y ago
I've even grown to enjoy spelling and grammar mistakes - at least I know a human wrote it.
- oneshtein 2y ago> Write a response to this comment, make spelling and grammar mistakes. yeah well sumtimes spellling and grammer erors just make thing hard two read. like i no wat u mean bout wanting two kno its a reel person, but i think cleear communication is still importint! ;)
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- 1aleksa 2y agoWhenever somebody misspells my name, I know it's legit haha
- sseagull 2y agoWay back when we had a landline and would get telemarketers, it was always a sign when the caller couldn’t pronounce our last name. It’s not even that uncommon a name, either
- Gigachad 2y agoThere was a meme along the lines of people will start including slurs in their messages to prove it wasn’t AI generated.
- dijit 2y agoI mean, it's not a meme.. I included a few more "private" words than I should and I even tried to narrate things to prove I wasn't an AI. https://blog.dijit.sh/gcp-the-only-good-cloud/ https://blog.dijit.sh/gcp-the-only-good-cloud/ Not sure what else I should do, but it's pretty clear that it's not AI written (mostly because it's incoherent) even without grammar mistakes.
- bloak 2y agoI liked the "New to AWS / Experienced at AWS" cartoon.
- jay_kyburz 2y agoA few months ago, I tried to get Gemini to help me write some criticism of something. I can't even remember what it was, but I wanted to clearly say something was wrong and bad. Gemini just could not do it. It kept trying to avoid being explicitly negative. It wanted me to instead focus on the positive. I think it evidently just told me no, and that it would not do it.
- Gigachad 2y agoYeah all the current tools have this particular brand of corporate speech that’s pretty easy to pick up on. Overly verbose, overly polite, very vague, non assertive, and non opinionated.
- stahorn 2y agoNext big thing: AI that writes as British football hooligans talk about the referee after a match where their team lost?
- ipaio 2y agoYou can prompt/train the AI to add a couple of random minor errors. They're trained from human text after all, they can pretend to be as human as you like.
- eleveriven 2y agoMaking it feel like there's no reliable way to discern what's truly human
- vouaobrasil 2y agoThere is. Be vehemently against AI, put 100% AI free in your work. The more consistent you are against AI, the more likely people will believe you. Write articles slamming AI. Personally, I am 100% against AI and I state that loud and clear on my blogs and YouTube channel. I HATE AI.
- jaredsohn 2y agoHate to tell you but there is nothing stopping people using AI from doing the same thing.
- vouaobrasil 2y agoAI cannot build up a sufficient level of trust, especially if you are known in person by others who will vouch for you. That web of trust is hard to break with AI. And I am one of those.
- danielbln 2y agoAre you including transformer based translation models like Google Translate or Deepl in your categorical AI rejectio?
- vouaobrasil 2y agoYeah.
- fzzzy 2y agoGuess what? Now the computers will learn to do that so they can more convincingly pass a turing test.
- faragon 2y agoPeople could prompt for authenticity, adding subtle mistakes, etc. I hope that AI as a whole will help people writing better, if reading back the text. It is a bit like "The Substance" movie: a "better" version of ourselves.
- redandblack 2y agoyesss. my thought too. All the variations of English should not lost. I enjoyed all the belter dialogue in the expanse