9 ms·
While I can see Mark stepping away from direct action in politics simply because it is exhausting. Unfortunately his wealth is an indirect means of politics. M
by DaoVeles 2y ago
While I can see Mark stepping away from direct action in politics simply because it is exhausting. Unfortunately his wealth is an indirect means of politics.
Money is a token of power, billions in the bank influences politics.
- SpicyLemonZest 2y agoI don’t think that the kind of things the article describes him avoiding - abortion, race relations, voting initiatives - are related even indirectly to Mark Zuckerberg and how much wealth he has. It sounds like he’s well aware that he doesn’t live in some Platonically apolitical realm, and just isn’t as interested as he used to be in leveraging his resources to advance political goals.
- hulitu 2y ago> abortion, race relations, voting initiatives - are related even indirectly to Mark Zuckerberg and how much wealth he has Cambridge analytica ? (as one example of thousands operating on Meta's platform) /s