3 ms·
Roughly, I'd assume that the Screen Actors Guild was looking out for their member's interests. Current AI's don't seem much of a threat to firefighters or plum
by bell-cot 2y ago
Roughly, I'd assume that the Screen Actors Guild was looking out for their member's interests.
Current AI's don't seem much of a threat to firefighters or plumbers.
- amelius 2y agoHow about comic book artists or illustrators?
- Skeime 2y agoI think there is a significant difference between an AI "cloning" you versus an AI cloning your work. (I'm not saying that the latter is not a problem in need of regulation, just that it is different enough to warrant separate legislation -- which I expect to arrive soon-ish.)
- Lerc 2y agoCloning your work is protected, that's just copyright. Similarly you should already be protected from people claiming a work is by you. This law is similar in that vein in that it protects the use of your image which implicitly assumes your involvement. Using ideas of style in a work that can neither substitute an existing work nor claims to be the work of another is a different issue entirely.
- Skeime 2y agoYou're right, I shouldn't have used cloning for the work part, though I rather meant closely replicating an artists style through the use of AI.
- maccard 2y agoThose people should have their unions fight for it like SAG would. But this law covers everyone in CA
- exe34 2y agobut they are a major threat for politicians/public figures. admittedly the bulk of these will come from China/Russia/Iran, so the law doesn't really matter.