2 ms·
An out-of-band URL to the data without instructions on how the slice of interest was requested is not what I described. If average people can follow the steps
by DoctorOetker 2y ago
An out-of-band URL to the data without instructions on how the slice of interest was requested is not what I described.
If average people can follow the steps in detail, they will probably not contribute observations of significance, but the ivory tower effect would diminish. Otherwise people will just think of all the particle accelerators as very expensive nonsense they don't support.
And yes, I think there is a lot of precedent: look how the LLM community is blooming and all the money being poured in. Average Joe can interact with a chatbot online, Average Joe runs into tutorials and step by step instructions to run a local LLM, etc.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> look how the LLM community is blooming and all the money being poured in. Average Joe can interact with a chatbot online, Average Joe runs into tutorials Average Joe is consuming chat bots. He is not raising money or taking tutorials.
- DoctorOetker 2y agoThe mere act of consuming brings money to the field. Average Joe delegates part of his opinion to the friends or family or idols that are the closest proxies to a certain field. If those think poorly of a certain initiative because it feels exclusive or not down-to-earth enough it will fan-out to all the Average Joes they know. I'm not retarded but I am still not finding the 2017-2018 data through the URL you cited, guess how I will describe it to any acquaintances? Guess in what sense I will precondition the (dis)continuing validity of my comments upon the presence or absence of clear instructions so average joe can reproduce a finding? If it feels like Average Joes are requesting to hold their hand like a toddler, one is being exclusionary.