4 ms·
The examples were in my original YouTube post - it goes on for a really long time time. The latest set of links was to show that a majority of reviews consider
by bhouston 2y ago
The examples were in my original YouTube post - it goes on for a really long time time.
The latest set of links was to show that a majority of reviews considered PalWorld to be a ripoff of Pokemon.
Anyhow, top voted comment on this whole hacker news article is a satirical article on how PalWorld copied Pokemon characters but added guns, so yeah, you guys claiming it isn't a ripoff have minority viewpoints but you are pretty insistent on it, so have fun with that!
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41588152 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41588152
- GaggiX 2y agoIt is indeed satirical but you can agree with the SEO spam you sent before, just don't expect people to agree with you and whine about it if they don't, in fact I really doubt it's the minority viewpoint given you got downvoted and plenty of people upvoted mine, reality speaks for itself.
- Dylan16807 2y ago"ripoff" is a very vague term and not equivalent to copying specific creature designs. I can call lots of AAA games ripoffs. I'm not specifically saying PalWorld isn't a ripoff here, what people call ripoff is pretty subjective, I'm saying the designs are fine. (Though the gameplay is very different from pokemon.)