4 ms·
One question seems obvious: With AIs and stuff, are we saving humanity's digital history, or are we saving a swarm of potentially biased auto-generated content
by alganet 2y ago
One question seems obvious:
With AIs and stuff, are we saving humanity's digital history, or are we saving a swarm of potentially biased auto-generated content published by the few that can afford the large scale deployment of LLMs?
- jmclnx 2y agoMaybe recent pages this is true, but in 2013, AFAIK AI was not yet a thing. But too bad these sites generated by AI are not tagged in some manner. But an argument could be made that these AI pages are reviewed by a person before they hit the WEB. One can hope anyway :)
- alganet 2y agoLet's consider SEO practices as an example. SEO spam probably IS very likely always reviewed by a person before publishing. It is still biased and garbage anyway, because the reviewer only cares about its effect on affecting ranking algorithms, not the heritage of digital human history.