I agree. I shouldn't have used the word "hallucinations" since the point of the conversation above my comment was that they are not really hallucinations by any

I agree. I shouldn't have used the word "hallucinations" since the point of the conversation above my comment was that they are not really hallucinations by any meaningful definition of the word. My question was more about whether "babbling" with statistically likely tokens can eventually emerge into real cognition. If we add enough neurons to a neural network, will it achieve AGI? or is there some special sauce that is still missing.