3 ms·
ImplicitCAD is more powerful than OpenSCAD. See the FAQ: https://www.implicitcad.org/docs/faq https://www.implicitcad.org/docs/faq
by naasking 2y ago
ImplicitCAD is more powerful than OpenSCAD. See the FAQ:
https://www.implicitcad.org/docs/faq https://www.implicitcad.org/docs/faq
- sitkack 2y agoIt isnt because it doesn't work. The CSG algorithms they use are broken.
- naasking 2y agoIn what way?
- sitkack 2y agoRun this in both implicitcad and openscad https://github.com/Haskell-Things/ImplicitCAD/blob/master/Examples/example15.scad https://github.com/Haskell-Things/ImplicitCAD/blob/master/Ex... Try and form a clean ring by subtracting a cylinder from it, you have to dial the resolution so high that it takes minutes to get a result that approximates what you can get min milliseconds in openscad. The team is not interesting in fixing it and shows a fundamental flaw with how they handle thin intersections. ImplicitCad is sadly nothing more than a non-functioning hobby project and should be labeled as such.