3 ms·

Or you can download OpenSCAD. https://openscad.org https://openscad.org

• mkl 2y ago
  But see the current OpenSCAD thread for plenty of reasons you might not want to, and for alternatives: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41543386 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41543386
• naasking 2y ago
  ImplicitCAD is more powerful than OpenSCAD. See the FAQ: https://www.implicitcad.org/docs/faq https://www.implicitcad.org/docs/faq
  • sitkack 2y ago
    It isnt because it doesn't work. The CSG algorithms they use are broken.
    • naasking 2y ago
      In what way?
      • sitkack 2y ago
        Run this in both implicitcad and openscad https://github.com/Haskell-Things/ImplicitCAD/blob/master/Examples/example15.scad https://github.com/Haskell-Things/ImplicitCAD/blob/master/Ex... Try and form a clean ring by subtracting a cylinder from it, you have to dial the resolution so high that it takes minutes to get a result that approximates what you can get min milliseconds in openscad. The team is not interesting in fixing it and shows a fundamental flaw with how they handle thin intersections. ImplicitCad is sadly nothing more than a non-functioning hobby project and should be labeled as such.