4 ms·
Well, it’s mostly being used to simulate 30+ year old chips, so doesn’t need to be the latest and greatest
by bluescrn 2y ago
Well, it’s mostly being used to simulate 30+ year old chips, so doesn’t need to be the latest and greatest
- foft 2y agoThere are a few improvements that could still be useful: i) FPGA on a newer process so it can clock higher. For faster 68k in the Amiga core and pentium 1 equivalent speeds in the x86 core. ii) Faster ARM chip and better ARM-FPGA fabric, opening up hybrid emulation. Currently the ARM-FPGA layer is a real bottleneck and also the ARM core is a little slow. iii) More spare IO to allow per-system custom io boards. iv) Built in IO/memory board so they can fit in a nicely designed case rather than the current eyesore.
- crtified 2y agoSome of those wishes may be addressed by the DE25 line, which is under investigation as a possible next-gen direction for MiSTer. As discussed in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z0l9cLO0jA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z0l9cLO0jA
- snvzz 2y ago>ii) Faster ARM chip and better ARM-FPGA fabric, opening up hybrid emulation. Currently the ARM-FPGA layer is a real bottleneck and also the ARM core is a little slow. I'd hope for replacement with the open standard RISC-V instead, as used in many of the newer FPGA families.
- Dylan16807 2y agoThe problem is that the FPGA is still priced similarly to when it was the latest and greatest.